Four Decades of Funding of U.S. Marine Biology: Are We In Trouble?

Al and I spoke previously about how for too long ocean exploration has suffered from chronic underfunding and the lack of an independent agency with a dedicated mission. We called for the creation of a NASA-style agency to ensure the future health of US ocean science and exploration (Read Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3).  In Part 1, I spoke about declining and stagnant funding for ocean science.  To further drive this point home, I collected data on grants from NSF’s Biological Oceanography Program.  For background, this is the primary program within NSF that funds marine biological research.  What the program has funded is public domain and available here.  Pop me line on Twitter @DrCraigMc if you want the raw data, pivot tables, and figures.

The above chart displays the total amount of dollars per year that went to funded grants.  You can see there was growth throughout the 1970′s and 1980′s, followed by relatively little change in 1990′s, and some increase in this decade.  Admittedly, the change  during this decade is not sharp and recent highs in the later part of this decade are largely due to a one time burst of funds from Obama’s stimulus package.  Two points of interest are 2000 and 2004 where total funding was larger than any other year prior or after. In 2000 the total funds were $62,433,190. This seems to be distributed pretty evenly across a greater number of grants with a few being really large including the GLOBEC Long-Term Observation Program in the Marine Ecosystem of the Northern California Current and an award to the University of California San Diego for four oceanographic research vessels operated by Scripps Institution of Oceanography. 2004 reflects the $35 million grant awarded to Woods Hole Oceanographic to rebuild the Alvin submersible. It would be interesting to know what caused the peak in funding in 2000.

You might argue there has been a slight increase in funding for marine biology or at worst that levels are remaining about the same for the last decade or so.  But let’s drill into the data further.

If we look at the total number of grants, a steady decline since the early 1990′s occurred. Of course 2000 is an exception again and so is the the recent rise due to the stimulus package.  Of course note that 2010 is one of the lowest years since 1975.

But what about the average dollar amount per grant?

Again with 2000 and 2004 as outliers, the average grant amount as steadily increased.  In the last decade the amount has remained about the same.  To restate, the average amount of any single grant has increased but the number of grants funded has decreased and the total NSF amount of funding for marine biology has at best only slightly increased.

There are two possible explanations for this pattern of fewer grants with larger budgets.  One, there has been a move toward more collaborative, multi-investigator grants.  I am not sure there is strong evidence for this as biological oceanography, and oceanography in general, has historically relied upon scientists collaborating on large oceanic projects. Second, and more likely, is that increasing costs mean any scientist will be requesting significantly more funds.  Personal, equipment, and fuel all have risen in price.  Universities now typically charge 50% for indirect costs (funds added to a grant budget to support indirect university administrative and facilities support and not directly the science) as opposed to closer to 20% a decade or two ago.

To put this in perspective, consider this final plot.

As a metric for inflation, I gathered information on the average price for a gallon of diesel since 1993.  It is clear in the last two decades that the total amount of fuel that the total annual NSF Biological Program funding will cover has steadily declined.

So where does this leave the future of marine biology in the United States? I hope it looks like this.

Dr. M (1618 Posts)

Craig McClain is the Assistant Director of Science for the National Evolutionary Synthesis Center, created to facilitate research to address fundamental questions in evolutionary science. He has conducted deep-sea research for 11 years and published over 40 papers in the area. He has participated in dozens of expeditions taking him to the Antarctic and the most remote regions of the Pacific and Atlantic. Craig’s research focuses mainly on marine systems and particularly the biology of body size, biodiversity, and energy flow. He focuses often on deep-sea systems as a natural test of the consequences of energy limitation on biological systems. He is the author and chief editor of Deep-Sea News, a popular deep-sea themed blog, rated the number one ocean blog on the web and winner of numerous awards. Craig’s popular writing has been featured in Cosmos, Science Illustrated, American Scientist, Wired, Mental Floss, and the Open Lab: The Best Science Writing on the Web.





, ,
3 comments on “Four Decades of Funding of U.S. Marine Biology: Are We In Trouble?
  1. I want to be a Marine Biology.. I want to earn money and put an honor to my family name… and I want to explore the Wide Vast Sea! even though I am stuck at computer

  2. My entire life, I have been fascinated with the World’s Oceans. I have wanted to be a marine biologist since I was very young. I have specifically wanted to study sharks and related species (chondrichthyes), and in recent years, I have turned part of my attention to the deep, abyssal, and less explored regions of the Oceans. I am currently attending college in an effort to obtain the knowledge and prerequisites necessary to be a marine biologist, but I cant help but feel like this career is too difficult to even reach. It seems like everyone puts me down for wanting to be a marine biologist… First of all, everyone says its EXTREMELY competitive because there aren’t many job openings, and everyone wants to be one. Also, everyone makes it seem like you will be dirt poor if you dedicate your life to a career like this; like you can’t support a family. Now, with lack of research funding from the government, it just seems all the more impossible to achieve this career. I want to do what I love, but how do I get there? I am a fairly good student, but I’m certainly not the best student in the country or even at my school for that matter. So if anyone has any advice to help me understand the reality and feasibility of becoming a marine biologist, especially in such competitive times, I would greatly appreciate it!

Comments are closed.