Deep sea fishing is ‘oceanocide’

Claire Nouvian, author of The Deep, provides a blunt and passionate discussion of why deep-sea fishing is very, very bad over at CNN.

In blatant ignorance of science and oblivious to common sense, bottom trawling — or “bulldozing,” as it should be called — goes on with the complicity of our governments and our own support.Large subsidies are paid to trawling fleets with our tax money. Every one of us is thus paying for industrial-scale ships to go out and pillage our planet’s last pristine wilderness, contributing to an unprecedented “oceanocide”, the largest and fastest ecological crime of all time.

But the point is made strongest when she states

A scientist has calculated that “sustainable” fishing in the deep Central Pacific would mean each ship would catch one fish a day.

As you might expect we are well over this maximum sustainable yield.

Dr. M (1619 Posts)

Craig McClain is the Assistant Director of Science for the National Evolutionary Synthesis Center, created to facilitate research to address fundamental questions in evolutionary science. He has conducted deep-sea research for 11 years and published over 40 papers in the area. He has participated in dozens of expeditions taking him to the Antarctic and the most remote regions of the Pacific and Atlantic. Craig’s research focuses mainly on marine systems and particularly the biology of body size, biodiversity, and energy flow. He focuses often on deep-sea systems as a natural test of the consequences of energy limitation on biological systems. He is the author and chief editor of Deep-Sea News, a popular deep-sea themed blog, rated the number one ocean blog on the web and winner of numerous awards. Craig’s popular writing has been featured in Cosmos, Science Illustrated, American Scientist, Wired, Mental Floss, and the Open Lab: The Best Science Writing on the Web.





, , ,
4 comments on “Deep sea fishing is ‘oceanocide’
  1. The frustrating thing about the article is that while it makes the point that deep sea fishing must be stopped, it doesn’t provide any guidance for consumers on how to tell which fish and shellfish are caught that way. It would be really helpful to know exactly what species and/or fisheries should be avoided.

  2. There are plenty of guides out there that tell you whether the fishery is sustainable or not (eg http://montereybayaquarium.typepad.com/sea_notes/2010/09/whole-foods-seafood-watch-team-up.html ), but the info may be limited to the target species and not include bycatch. Also, recent research shows that one of the more important schemes seem to fail their objectives, despite huge amounts funding backing it (http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/09/100901132159.htm )
    Seems like it’s a matter of looking up whether the fish/seafood you regularly buy comes from the deep-sea, if it does and you care about the health of our oceans, then don’t buy it. Fishbase might be able to guide people in this.
    Good that someone has the guts to put it so bluntly, long enough has the damage to the seafloor and its ecosystems caused by destructive fishing practises been shrouded in scientific reservedness (partly due to lack of funding to perform conclusive fisheries research!)

  3. A la mountain top removal, maybe they should call it ocean bottom removal. Not exactly analogous, but evocative.

Comments are closed.