<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The New Navy Has Both Faster and Unmanned Subs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://deepseanews.com/2009/07/the-new-navy-has-both-faster-and-unmanned-subs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://deepseanews.com/2009/07/the-new-navy-has-both-faster-and-unmanned-subs/</link>
	<description>All the news on the Earth&#039;s largest environment.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:38:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beausaber</title>
		<link>http://deepseanews.com/2009/07/the-new-navy-has-both-faster-and-unmanned-subs/comment-page-1/#comment-7835</link>
		<dc:creator>Beausaber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 07:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deepseanews.com/?p=5288#comment-7835</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s BUDGET TIME!!

First, the Soviet Shkval torpedo was developed in the 1980&#039;s

Second, supercavitaion 

1) Blinds your own sonar

2) Makes a noise loud enough to be heard a couple of hundred miles away by modern passive sonars (warship propellors are designed NOT to caviate for that very reason). Since a sub&#039;s primary value is stealth, the idea is nonsensical

3) Objects moving at high speed in any medium are predictable - it takes a lot of energy and time to change the course (Newton&#039;s Laws of Motion). So anyone who wants to intercept it, just tracks the noise signal for a brief period, gos to where the computer says the sub si alikely to be and voila. And because you are blind (see item 1), you don&#039;t even know he&#039;s waiting for you.     

Oh, and if you apply too much force trying to maneuver, you break the vehicle. In a sub, there aern&#039;t any ejection seats, everybody dies. 

Outside of that, it&#039;s a great idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s BUDGET TIME!!</p>
<p>First, the Soviet Shkval torpedo was developed in the 1980&#8242;s</p>
<p>Second, supercavitaion </p>
<p>1) Blinds your own sonar</p>
<p>2) Makes a noise loud enough to be heard a couple of hundred miles away by modern passive sonars (warship propellors are designed NOT to caviate for that very reason). Since a sub&#8217;s primary value is stealth, the idea is nonsensical</p>
<p>3) Objects moving at high speed in any medium are predictable &#8211; it takes a lot of energy and time to change the course (Newton&#8217;s Laws of Motion). So anyone who wants to intercept it, just tracks the noise signal for a brief period, gos to where the computer says the sub si alikely to be and voila. And because you are blind (see item 1), you don&#8217;t even know he&#8217;s waiting for you.     </p>
<p>Oh, and if you apply too much force trying to maneuver, you break the vehicle. In a sub, there aern&#8217;t any ejection seats, everybody dies. </p>
<p>Outside of that, it&#8217;s a great idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer Frazer</title>
		<link>http://deepseanews.com/2009/07/the-new-navy-has-both-faster-and-unmanned-subs/comment-page-1/#comment-7830</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Frazer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 20:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deepseanews.com/?p=5288#comment-7830</guid>
		<description>If I ever get drafted, I would like to sign up for the &lt;i&gt;Irregular Warfare Office&lt;/i&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I ever get drafted, I would like to sign up for the <i>Irregular Warfare Office</i>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

